Getting To Yes Summary: Roger Fisher, William Ury & Bruce M. Patton

0
Getting To Yes Summary

Getting To Yes Summary provides a free full summary, key takeaways, top quotes, author biography and other key points of Roger Fisher, William Ury and Bruce M. Patton’s book.

This book explains the key to effective negotiation. It’s a step-by-step guide. The book uses subjective examples. These examples show both negative and positive negotiation strategies. It’s possible to reach an amicable agreement with proper negotiation. Principled negotiation involves respect for each other’s interests. The parties then jointly create options which are mutually beneficial. This results in a proper settlement. It’s the second edition. Hence, authors answer ten questions of readers from the first edition. Q&A part will be helpful if you get any doubts while reading. The text is simple to read and understand. Also, you can instantly use the techniques. Can we ask for more? Probably no.

Best Selling Books

SaleBestseller No. 1
Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
1,036 Reviews
Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
  • Penguin Books
  • Roger Fisher, William L. Ury, Bruce Patton
  • Publisher: Penguin Books
  • Edition no. 0 (05/03/2011)
  • Paperback: 240 pages
SaleBestseller No. 2
Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
1,036 Reviews
Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
  • Houghton Mifflin
  • William L. Ury, Roger Fisher, Bruce M. Patton
  • Publisher: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
  • Edition no. 0 (04/30/1992)
  • Hardcover: 224 pages
Bestseller No. 3
Getting to Yes: Negotiating an agreement without giving in
1,036 Reviews
Getting to Yes: Negotiating an agreement without giving in
  • FISHER/URY
  • Publisher: Random House
  • Edition no. 12000 (01/01/1970)
  • Paperback: 204 pages

This Summary Will Help You Learn

  • The key to effective negotiation;
  • Strategies to present an agreement or answer an attack; and
  • When to and when not to have a mediator.

Take-Aways

  • Is relationship the main concern in negotiation? Then you are at risk of reaching a bad agreement.
  • People and problem are separate in a wise negotiation.
  • Don’t focus on positions; rather on interests”.
  • Produce a range of options before making a decision.
  • Insist that impartial standards be used for results.
  • Identify your BATNA – the Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement.
  • Quality of your BATNA determines your power in a negotiation. Political ties, wealth or physical strength do not determine your power.
  • Don’t use statements; instead, use questions. Silence can be your weapon.
  • Ask something. Then pause. Even when you aren’t talking, you’re doing some great negotiation.
  • When nothing else works, use a third-party mediator.

Best Selling Kindle

Bestseller No. 1
Kindle Paperwhite E-reader - White, 6' High-Resolution Display (300 ppi) with Built-in Light, Wi-Fi - Includes Special Offers
60,971 Reviews
Kindle Paperwhite E-reader - White, 6" High-Resolution Display (300 ppi) with Built-in Light, Wi-Fi - Includes Special Offers
  • Now available in black or white
  • Higher resolution display (300 ppi) - with twice as many pixels
  • Built-in adjustable light - read day and night
  • No screen glare, even in bright sunlight, unlike tablets
  • A single battery charge lasts weeks, not hours

Getting To Yes Summary

Judging Negotiation Styles: Hard vs. Soft 

Negotiation involves giving up and taking on positions. The two parties negotiate over positions. They lock themselves in their own perspectives. Such a process needs many different decisions. It makes the bargain difficult. Strategies like threats or stonewalling are common. Positional bargain raises the cost and time to come to an agreement. There’s also a risk that no agreement is reached at. The fight of egos damage relationships. Bitter feelings last for a lifetime.

Many know the risk of positional bargain. Hence, they use a softer approach. They treat the opposite party as a friend. Plus, they show agreement as their goal, not a victory. It’s common to make offers and discounts to be friendly. This is also done to prevent argument. Most negotiation among family and friends happens this way. The resulting agreements are quick. But, they may not be wise. The relationship shouldn’t be the main concern in a negotiation.  If it is, then the agreement is shabby. People pursuing soft positional bargain are weak in front of a hard negotiator.

Change the Game

Which positional bargain should you use – hard or soft? None. Rather, “change your game.”

The Harvard Negotiation Project came with an alternative. It is Principled Negotiation. This means negotiating on merits. There’re 4 core points to it:

  1. People – Don’t attack people, but the problem. People mix their egos with the positions. They don’t communicate in a clear way.
  2. Interests – Don’t focus on positions, but on interests. Try to satisfy the main interests because of which parties took their positions.
  3. Options – Creating good solutions under pressure is tough. Making decisions in front of the opponent narrows the vision. You may limit your creativity if you’ve too much at stake. To beat these problems, set a time to generate likely options. These solutions should promote joint interests and settle the differences.
  4. Criteria – Some negotiators are stubborn. This way they get what they want. Handle such a negotiator by claiming that one voice isn’t enough. Ask for a fair criterion for the agreement. This criterion must be independent of both sides’ desires. Use unbiased standards to base the terms. These can include market value, law or expert opinion. Both parties can work to arrive at a fair deal. No single party needs to give in.

Do such principles work if one side is richer or a stronger negotiator? How useful is talking about options, interests or standards in this case? Each negotiation has some strict realities. You may attack a problem on its merits. But, what if the other side attacks you? No strategy can work if the other party has every leverage. A bargain strategy can only save you from agreeing on things you must reject. It can also help to make the most of your assets. But this is it. Talking about options etc. is wise. But also keep a strategy if the other party doesn’t play. Try changing the game to a “principled negotiation.”

Using a “Bottom Line”

You can save yourself from a bad result by setting a bottom line. This is the worst acceptable result to help you fight the pressures. But, such protection has a high cost. You may be firm that anything the other party says can’t change your bottom line. But, this way you’re limiting your ability to use things you learn while negotiating. A bottom line tends to be very rigid. It limits creativity and you’re unable to devise a wise solution.

Know Your BATNA

A bottom-line may save you from a poor agreement. But, it will also ruin your chances to create a solution. An alternative to the bottom line is determining your BATNA. BATNA stands for Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. Analyse a proposed agreement against BATNA. It will save you from agreeing to a bad proposal. Plus, it’ll prevent you from declining an agreement of your interest. A BATNA isn’t rigid. It’ll allow you to seek a creative solution. Compare your BATNA with your proposal. Check which meets your interests better. 

If you don’t think about BATNA, you’re bargaining with closed eyes. You might be very optimistic. It’s possible that you might have other choices. But even if you have an alternative, think carefully. Because then, you’ll not appreciate the results of using that option. Overcommitment to coming to an agreement is a big risk. Keep a temporary answer to, “what if the negotiation doesn’t work?” This is very important for a wise negotiation. The quality of your BATNA determines your power to negotiate. Not your wealth or political connections. Wealth can also weaken the bargain position of a party wanting a lower price. How appealing it’s for both parties do not reach an agreement? The answer to this determines the negotiation power.

Generating Your BATNA

Adopt these three operations to generate your BATNAs. Firstly, list down the actions you may take in case there’s no agreement. Then, work on the ideas with the highest potential. Convert these ideas into practical options. Lastly, choose the best alternative. Your BATNA is here! A good BATNA makes it easier to improve the terms of a negotiated agreement. It gives you the confidence to stop a negotiation. When you’re willing to break a negotiation, then you can put your interests more forcefully.

Reflect on the Other Side’s BATNA

Consider the other party’s BATNA. It’ll better prepare you for the bargain. This way, you can predict what to expect in a negotiation. Suppose their BATNA is very good. And they will not need to bargain on merits. In this case, how can you change their BATNA? For e.g. a power plant is spreading pollution in a local area. Their BATNA is to neglect protests and keep on doing the business. In this case, you need to file for a ban to cease their operations. This will make their BATNA less appealing than earlier. When both parties’ BATNAs are attractive, it’s not possible to reach an agreement. What to do in this case? Amicably decide to look somewhere else instead of reaching the agreement.

Negotiation Jujitsu

What if even the BATNA strategy fails? Then you may use an approach focusing on what the other party might do. You may counter the core moves of the positional bargain. This will redirect their focus to the case’s merits. It’s called the “negotiation jujitsu”. In the positional bargain, saving your position will lock you in. Plus, attacking the other side’s position will lock them in. Too much energy and time are spent on this cycle. So, what to do if pushing back isn’t working? It’s simple. Stop pushing back. Don’t defend when they attack. Break this cycle by not reacting. Like in jujitsu and judo also, you don’t put all your strength against the opponent. Rather step aside and use their own strength against them.

In real-life negotiation jujitsu addresses three types of attacks:

  1. Forcefully asserting their position.
  2. Attack on your stances.
  3. Personal attack.
  • The forceful assertion of their position – When the other party puts their ideas, don’t attack them. Instead, see them as a possible solution. Consider ways to make it better. Find the interests below their position. See each position as a genuine try to handle the main concerns of both parties. Ask how that position deals with the issue. Review their position. Check the degree to which it satisfies interests of both sides. Also, see how to improve the position. For improving it, discuss what’ll happen if their terms are accepted. It’s important for them to know that for you it’s unrealistic option. Hence, they may accept other alternatives.
  • The attack on your ideas – If they attack your ideas, don’t save them. Invite advice and criticism. Don’t force them to accept or reject your ideas. Rather, ask what’s wrong with them. By knowing their negative stances, you can know their core interests. This way you can make your ideas better from their stance. Turn criticism into a key ingredient for the process. Seek their advice. Place them in your shoes and ask what they’d do. This way they confront half of your problem. Maybe they can create a solution which satisfies your concerns.
  • The personal attack – Try not to defend yourself even when they attack you personally. Be patient. Allow the other side to vent out. Listen. Show that you understand their feelings. When they’re done, use the personal attack as one on the issue.

Remember two key tools when using jujitsu approach. First, don’t use statements, rather use questions. Second, silence is a great weapon. Questions produce answers, but statements build resistance. When you ask questions, the other party can outline its points. Questions can enable the other party to face the problem. Rather than criticizing, queries educate. Silence creates the impression of a deadlock. If you ask something and get a vague answer, wait. When people doubt what they said, silence could be uncomfortable. The other party is likely to feel pressured to break the silence. Then they may answer in more detail or have a new suggestion. Ask queries and take a break. You can do some of the wisest negotiations by keeping mum.

One-Text Procedure: Call in a Mediator

When everything else fails, call the third-party. Mediators separate the problem from the people more easily. They take the discussion to options and interests. Mediators offer an impartial basis to make decisions. Plus, they also decrease the number of decisions to come to an agreement. Rather they’re only exploring the possibility to give a recommendation.

They use this detail and make a list of needs and interests. Then they ask both sides to give their opinions on the list. Mediators use such criticism to improve things. Criticism is better than making compromises. They use this criticism to make a rough draft of the agreement. Mediators claim that the agreement may have errors. But, they want both parties’ input before going ahead. They then use such input to make the second draft. This’s still not complete, but better than the initial one.

The cycle goes on for a third, fourth and fifth plan. Mediators don’t stop until they think that no more improvement is possible. Now, they give the plan to both sides. Each side has just one decision to take: no or yes. The one-text process moves the game away from the positional bargain. It simplifies the process of building options and mutually deciding one. This process is very important for big multi-layered negotiations.

Suggested Summary: The Power of Positive Thinking Summary: Norman Vincent Peale

Best Selling Books

SaleBestseller No. 1
Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
1,036 Reviews
Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
  • Penguin Books
  • Roger Fisher, William L. Ury, Bruce Patton
  • Publisher: Penguin Books
  • Edition no. 0 (05/03/2011)
  • Paperback: 240 pages
SaleBestseller No. 2
Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
1,036 Reviews
Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
  • Houghton Mifflin
  • William L. Ury, Roger Fisher, Bruce M. Patton
  • Publisher: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
  • Edition no. 0 (04/30/1992)
  • Hardcover: 224 pages
Bestseller No. 3
Getting to Yes: Negotiating an agreement without giving in
1,036 Reviews
Getting to Yes: Negotiating an agreement without giving in
  • FISHER/URY
  • Publisher: Random House
  • Edition no. 12000 (01/01/1970)
  • Paperback: 204 pages

Getting To Yes Quotes

“The first thing you are trying to win is a better way to negotiate – a way that avoids your having to choose between the sat­is­fac­tions of getting what you deserve and of being decent. You can have both.”

“If your response to sustained, hard positional bargaining is soft positional bargaining, you will probably lose your shirt.”

“If you do not like the choice between hard and soft positional bargaining, you can change the game.”

“Separating the people from the problem allows you to deal directly and em­pa­thet­i­cally with the other negotiator as a human being, thus making possible an amicable agreement.”

“The relative negotiating power of two parties depends primarily upon how attractive to each is the option of not reaching agreement.”

“What is true for ne­go­ti­a­tions between individuals is equally true for ne­go­ti­a­tions between or­ga­ni­za­tions.”

“The relative negotiating power of a large industry and a small town is determined not by the relative size of their respective budgets, or their political clout, but by each side’s best alternative.”

“Developing your BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement) thus not only enables you to determine what is a minimally acceptable agreement, it will probably raise that minimum.”

“Principled negotiation will produce over the long run substantive outcomes as good or better than you are likely to obtain using any other negotiation strategy. In addition, it should prove efficient and less costly to re­la­tion­ships.”

“Developing your BATNA is perhaps the most effective course of action you can take in dealing with a more powerful negotiator.”

Best Selling Kindle

Bestseller No. 1
Kindle Paperwhite E-reader - White, 6' High-Resolution Display (300 ppi) with Built-in Light, Wi-Fi - Includes Special Offers
60,971 Reviews
Kindle Paperwhite E-reader - White, 6" High-Resolution Display (300 ppi) with Built-in Light, Wi-Fi - Includes Special Offers
  • Now available in black or white
  • Higher resolution display (300 ppi) - with twice as many pixels
  • Built-in adjustable light - read day and night
  • No screen glare, even in bright sunlight, unlike tablets
  • A single battery charge lasts weeks, not hours

About the Authors

Roger Fisher is a professor at the Harvard Law School teaching negotiation. He’s also the director of the Harvard Negotiation Project. Fisher was the executive editor and originator of the acclaimed TV series, The Advocates. William L. Ury authored Getting Past No: Negotiating Your Way from Confrontation to CooperationBruce M. Patton co-authored Difficult Conversations: How to Discuss What Matters Most.

Feedback

What is your thought on Getting To Yes Summary? Please feel free to leave us your comment. We are looking forward to hearing from you!

Do you want to learn more about business and finance? Please have a look at the following book summaries:

Last update on 2018-06-21 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here